From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id s1XSKXlWHmJCfgAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 12:23:05 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 9AA471F3CA; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 12:23:05 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 353BA1EA69 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 12:23:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B5F385841E for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 17:23:04 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A5B5F385841E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1646155384; bh=I2H8UrPXP42l2OY3op2gfYbxT/Cj9K+sCyA6IhDlQaw=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=tV9nWNwIi5CwMYMbNQ5MZISpsTt6cw9zYatdakiw+tBL3dMNsX6MSntqybny1Npzd CrPenhOGGGi7k7REjkye95DWEoWSHcLWsZuNAoE46KEZBxLrbQTXwcHEx1NLwtEJt9 wCNSpw8qqebYE1bRrd5pyHToVlpkuW8h+aJJ/sK8= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [209.51.188.92]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC5CA3858D20 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 17:22:45 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org DC5CA3858D20 Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=40172 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nP6Cz-0005o9-9J; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 12:22:45 -0500 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4705 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nP6Cy-0001NC-OC; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 12:22:45 -0500 Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 19:22:37 +0200 Message-Id: <8335k1lh9e.fsf@gnu.org> To: Tom Tromey In-Reply-To: <20220301170055.1520935-3-tromey@adacore.com> (message from Tom Tromey via Gdb-patches on Tue, 1 Mar 2022 10:00:54 -0700) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Implement real literal extension for Ada References: <20220301170055.1520935-1-tromey@adacore.com> <20220301170055.1520935-3-tromey@adacore.com> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 10:00:54 -0700 > From: Tom Tromey via Gdb-patches > Cc: Tom Tromey > > +* GDB's Ada parser now supports an extension for specifying the exact > + byte contents of a floating-point literal. This can be useful for "Exact byte contents" is not the best way to describe this specification of a value. If no better idea emerges, how about using the same description as you used in the manual? Otherwise, the documentation part is OK. Thanks.