From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id +0GyOJa3sWIT/AMAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 08:20:38 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id D72171E225; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 08:20:38 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=Yt+bKfUq; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 844AD1E15C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 08:20:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61383856940 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 12:20:37 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C61383856940 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1655814037; bh=EjRO1YUGWkc4wKRTeOvw4GZULdiGyvOB8tWKUg1e92U=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=Yt+bKfUqXhmNa/WOYX2GPkrnYbyt08XOZdf5eHoXk+84Rz1D9ESinJawmmbKCs6qN NwAb9/vX/d6Ot0PbsvV7jPXj2buMv1jMfVOMB2OSL6Sx1MeLmg9Op/U7FveoeS3aT6 a9zfUpyzCb+wYwS8fsnpXtQIyIPNWJLU78RB9E5E= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [209.51.188.92]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 741B33858C56 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 12:20:19 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 741B33858C56 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43534) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o3cre-0007h3-65; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 08:20:14 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4707 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o3crY-0004sR-J5; Tue, 21 Jun 2022 08:20:13 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 15:19:57 +0300 Message-Id: <8335fyky36.fsf@gnu.org> To: Paulo Neves In-Reply-To: (message from Paulo Neves on Tue, 21 Jun 2022 13:17:32 +0200) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gdb/python doc: Add register_unwinder to code example References: <20220528115509.3865342-1-ptsneves@gmail.com> <20220528115509.3865342-2-ptsneves@gmail.com> <83tu99luft.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 13:17:32 +0200 > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > From: Paulo Neves > > Hello all, > > Any idea when this can be merged or if there anything missing? Like I said before: this needs to be approved by someone who knows about Python unwinder programming. If the text is correct, the Texinfo use was already approved by me.