From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7703 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2011 20:54:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 7694 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Jun 2011 20:54:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 20:53:58 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LM600200KLNF600@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 23:53:34 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.223.140]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LM6000Y8KP8F0S0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 23:53:33 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 20:54:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: RFA: fix PR mi/12661 In-reply-to: To: Tom Tromey Cc: pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <831uzceyzr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <201104271926.30493.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201106021834.58440.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00042.txt.bz2 > From: Tom Tromey > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:20:57 -0600 > > Pedro> You'll want to update the docs to mention the exit_code/exit-code > Pedro> fields aren't always present, I think. > > Good point, here is the patch with a doc addition. Thanks. > -@itemx =thread-group-exited,id="@var{id}" > +@itemx =thread-group-exited,id="@var{id}"[,exit-code="@var{code}"] This should be @item, not @itemx. (Yes, the original text was also in error.) > +thread group. The @var{code} field is the exit code of the inferior; "Code" is not a field, it's the value of the "exit-code" field, isn't it? Okay with those changes.