From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-88934-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 26519 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2012 18:15:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 26511 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Mar 2012 18:15:16 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il (HELO mtaout23.012.net.il) (80.179.55.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:15:01 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M0X00K00UO7C000@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:14:50 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.179.236]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M0X00JMBUOOUPE0@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:14:50 +0200 (IST)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:15:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA take 6] Allow setting breakpoints on inline functions (PR	10738)
In-reply-to: <20120315181002.GA10803@redhat.com>
To: Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com>
Cc: dje@google.com, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, mark@klomp.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <831uotwx2d.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20120314133746.GA5696@redhat.com> <CADPb22QG1YVEcrFY8TqDnQixKQgceg-H+LKiMAjUZnGASzvjzg@mail.gmail.com> <20120314175451.GA20072@host2.jankratochvil.net> <CADPb22S8992GZdoP7x_o897bWhrzS5Cz9_agM_ThVRXpEDm3bA@mail.gmail.com> <20120315105117.GA3076@redhat.com> <833999wxkt.fsf@gnu.org> <20120315181002.GA10803@redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00556.txt.bz2

> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:10:02 +0000
> From: Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com>
> Cc: dje@google.com, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
>         mark@klomp.org
> 
> > > "Do not reject possibly inconsistent .gdb_index sections."
> > 
> > The meaning of that is that the sections being skipped are
> > inconsistent within themselves.  If that's really what you meant,
> > I'm fine with the change.
> 
> The issue is that with older index section the information in the
> .gdb_index sections is not consistent with the information that GDB
> would generate from the DWARF.

Why does this happen?  Is the information in those sections
inaccurate?