From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19931 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2013 02:54:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 19917 invoked by uid 89); 17 Apr 2013 02:54:54 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 02:54:53 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MLD00G00P94CY00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 05:54:41 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MLD00F5PPF4WI90@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 05:54:41 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:21:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH] print '--with{,out}-babeltrace' in 'gdb --configuration' In-reply-to: To: Doug Evans Cc: yao@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <831ua950jl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1365761475-23845-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <83fvyr58c5.fsf@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00518.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:36:54 -0700 > From: Doug Evans > Cc: Yao Qi , gdb-patches > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> [An alternative would be to punt on details at this level and instead > >> record the complete string passed to configure and print that.] > > > > That has its limitations, in that it only shows options explicitly > > mentioned on the configure command line, omitting the options that > > were automatically chosen by configure as result of probing the > > system. E.g., --with-expat. > > The intent is that it would be a supplement, not a replacement. > [Apologies if that wasn't clear ...] Sorry for my misunderstanding. In that case, it's probably a good idea, if there are important things that we cannot catch otherwise. > Note that the current code doesn't print *where* libexpat,etc. were found. > Do we want to take the step of adding that to config.in so it's > available to gdb to print? > [that's an honest question, not a rhetorical one] > Which gets back to my earlier question: > Do we care about printing --with-libbabeltrace-prefix? I'm not sure that place is of interest to anyone but the person who configured GDB.