From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-106863-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 23214 invoked by alias); 2 Nov 2013 07:06:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 23195 invoked by uid 89); 2 Nov 2013 07:06:26 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mtaout22.012.net.il
Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 07:06:25 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MVM00100JGCIM00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 09:06:22 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MVM00128JQM51A0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 09:06:22 +0200 (IST)
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 07:06:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] set/show code-cache NEWS and doc
In-reply-to: <52744600.9020205@codesourcery.com>
To: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <831u2zb7vg.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1382516855-32218-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1382516855-32218-6-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <83sivshuux.fsf@gnu.org> <5268D967.2000703@codesourcery.com> <837gd2itkj.fsf@gnu.org> <526A3B07.1020607@codesourcery.com> <83ob6dhdpt.fsf@gnu.org> <52744600.9020205@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00030.txt.bz2

> Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 08:23:28 +0800
> From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
> CC: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> 
> On 10/25/2013 06:00 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> How about "executable code"?
> > I would suggest "code section", unless you think that is incorrect for
> > some reason.
> 
> GDB can also access code generated by JIT, but they are not from "code 
> section".  On the other hand, "read code section" usually means "read 
> code section in executable file" rather than "read code section in live 
> inferior".

I'm also OK with "code segment", if you think it's more accurate.

"Executable code" is too vague to be helpful, IMO.