From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10518 invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2013 17:16:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 10480 invoked by uid 89); 10 Nov 2013 17:16:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout22.012.net.il Received: from Unknown (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 17:16:57 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MW200G0057A5400@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 19:16:48 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MW200GJF5BZ2U30@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 19:16:48 +0200 (IST) Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 22:16:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFC] Add ada-exception-catchpoints to -list-features command output. In-reply-to: <1384076960-12339-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <831u2o41on.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1384076960-12339-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00266.txt.bz2 > From: Joel Brobecker > Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 13:49:20 +0400 > > The -list-features GDB/MI command is extremely useful to GDB frontends > who would like to know whether the underlying GDB supports a given > feature or not. Recently, I added new coommands for Ada exception > catching, but forgot about -list-features. > > This patch adds an entry meant to help the frontend for those features. > But looking at the way the -list-features command is designed, I am > wondering whether this approach is going to scale well. As new commands > and other new features or major bug fixes get in, it seems like the > list is going to grow maybe a little beyond what's reasonable. Thanks, the documentation part is OK.