From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8467 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2015 20:41:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 8448 invoked by uid 89); 12 Feb 2015 20:41:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout26.012.net.il Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il (HELO mtaout26.012.net.il) (80.179.55.182) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:41:05 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NJO00G00EQ8SQ00@mtaout26.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:41:11 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NJO00F3HESMWR10@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:41:11 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:41:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc of pre-defined or builtin trace state variables In-reply-to: <3240.1423761326@usendtaylorx2l> To: David Taylor Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <831tlu6ey0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <2301.1423756145@usendtaylorx2l> <83fvab5bqw.fsf@gnu.org> <3240.1423761326@usendtaylorx2l> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00336.txt.bz2 > cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" > Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:15:26 -0500 > From: David Taylor > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > From: David Taylor > > > Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 10:49:05 -0500 > > > > > > Our tracepoint users want certain capabilities for which 'pre-defined' or > > > 'builtin' trace state variables seem like they would be a good fit. So, > > > I started looking into what it would take to modify both GDB and our GDB > > > stub to support them. > > > > > > Imagine my surprise to discover that GDB already supports them, but it > > > is not documented! > > > > > > Here's a patch. The pdf, html, and info targets build without > > > complaint. The modified paragraph in the pdf file looks okay. > > > > > > gdb/doc/ChangeLog: > > > > > > 2015-02-12 David Taylor > > > > > > * gdb.texinfo (Tracepoint Packets): Document the builtin and name > > > fields of the QTDV packet. > > > > Thanks, this is OK. > > Thanks. Will someone commit it for me? (I don't have commit privs.) Done. Should this be cherry-picked to the 7.9 branch?