From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 120274 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2019 14:45:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 120246 invoked by uid 89); 17 Oct 2019 14:45:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=emails X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (209.51.188.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 14:45:17 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38713) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iL71f-0007Ei-20; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:45:15 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1989 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iL71d-0001ea-0f; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:45:13 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 14:45:00 -0000 Message-Id: <831rvbbfdj.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Simon Marchi CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <727b01bf-d2f3-7ebd-0515-11a4263dd74c@simark.ca> (message from Simon Marchi on Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:22:04 -0400) Subject: Re: Gerrit emails References: <83eezbdewk.fsf@gnu.org> <727b01bf-d2f3-7ebd-0515-11a4263dd74c@simark.ca> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-10/txt/msg00568.txt.bz2 > From: Simon Marchi > Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:22:04 -0400 > > Ok, so the addresses are duplicated between the "To:" and the "Reply-to:" fields. I think the fact that some of them appear in CC might also matter. Also note that cbiesinger@google.com appears twice in Reply-To. > I am not sure what a client is expected to do in that case. There seems to be some > divergence between clients, for example Thunderbird doesn't duplicate the addresses > when I hit "Reply all". Perhaps Rmail can be modified to not put an address in CC > if it sees it's already in the To field? The logic in Rmail for how to generate the To: and CC: headers is complex and tries to support quite a few use cases. It never gave me any trouble, in all the years that I'm using it. Changing it for this single server would be unwise, IMO, because it will most probably break much more important use cases. > I did not find any setting in Gerrit to omit the "Reply-to" field of the sent messages, > so I fear it won't be possible to change it in the immediate. I can try to look > at modifying Gerrit from source, but that will take a bit of time. That's just too bad. Thanks for trying. Are you sure the Reply-To comes from Gerrit and not from the list server?