From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 8OVdKxqQiWCZLAAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:40:58 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id AF9151F11C; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:40:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CBCA1E54D for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:40:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEC473A9F45F; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 16:40:57 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CEC473A9F45F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1619628057; bh=Bpg4UDPCaAlzdYhVd2X0gPk3Jbv8LRwGhEv6UY1MkMM=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=uQR97b76qO32t2pBl1mN5rE+8oE/iIWKNInFzl7ja+XvNEeSghlgS4OlFtFu3DAPE ZwqTHBlEGkOslXIrP8L/C69Cqs/uajaePFmY+a3VWQ6SN2nuE8T+vxBSuAVTwFBTAc aS/Wwc31q9ZPXsQDo6ar2vaxtUy2CoRH1cbO9zj8= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C801394481A for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 16:40:56 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 5C801394481A Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47158) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lbnFA-0003hc-0q; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:40:56 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3282 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lbnF9-000245-EO; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:40:55 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:40:45 +0300 Message-Id: <831raufjle.fsf@gnu.org> To: George Barrett In-Reply-To: (message from George Barrett via Gdb-patches on Thu, 29 Apr 2021 02:27:37 +1000) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] Guile: add {r,}value-reference-value References: <&e1lx8mojs1b03hu3o_asydo0za8-nyh&337akgbzjn.o13/-otj@mail.bob131.so> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 02:27:37 +1000 > From: George Barrett via Gdb-patches > Cc: George Barrett > > The Guile API doesn't currently have an equivalent to the Python API's > Value.reference_value() or Value.rvalue_reference_value(). This commit > adds a procedure with equivalent semantics to the Guile API. > > gdb/ChangeLog: > > 2021-04-29 George Barrett > > * guile/scm-value.c (gdbscm_reference_value): Add helper > function for reference value creation. > (gdbscm_value_reference_value): Add implementation of > value-reference-value procedure. > (gdbscm_rvalue_reference_value): Add implementation of > rvalue-reference-value procedure. > (value_functions): Add value-reference-value procedure. > Add rvalue-reference-value procedure. > * NEWS (Guile API): Note the addition of new procedures. > > gdb/doc/ChangeLog: > > 2021-04-29 George Barrett > > * guile.texi (Values From Inferior In Guile): Add > documentation for value-reference-value. > Add documentation for rvalue-reference-value. > > gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > 2021-04-29 George Barrett > > * gdb.guile/scm-value.exp (test_value_in_inferior): Add test > for value-reference-value. > Add test for rvalue-reference-value. Thanks, the documentation parts are okay.