From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id UYdpFz21wGDKAQAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 08:34:05 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 4B8991F163; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 08:34:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA3561E813 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 08:34:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC6B3891C2C for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 12:34:04 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3CC6B3891C2C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1623242044; bh=XywbC8ICuK97ehBKi+UhCJKdoXro6QkbRBa523XNrso=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=W8BV4UCnriduekzwnbz9viKvTMDruN5VkN/pkC15c+rG0+8JAErcqnFxgzsfzyiU1 1dAEMaSMcRt28qHeLyCdwSme1ywRPuXaHYr0okExp30d04JBXJwgqeDEHxyGfBCiYV x23Hml99jQRmDpwdMIvGbjV4Woq2+4/izTKUzvjs= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BA803857C48 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 12:33:45 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 5BA803857C48 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41440) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqxOy-0002QH-Pn; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 08:33:44 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4104 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqxOy-0008LS-6s; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 08:33:44 -0400 Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 15:33:28 +0300 Message-Id: <831r9bdxpj.fsf@gnu.org> To: Vasili Burdo In-Reply-To: (message from Vasili Burdo via Gdb-patches on Tue, 8 Jun 2021 19:16:20 +0300) Subject: Re: [PATCH] TUI disassembly window improvemenmt References: X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 19:16:20 +0300 > From: Vasili Burdo via Gdb-patches > > I implemented a small update to TUI disassembly window - see attachment. > This patch removes function name from disassembly listing leaving only > offset from function start. > The reason for it - disassembly TUI is almost unusable in case of C++ > functions - their names (especially templated ones) are very long and > thus litter disassembly view. Shouldn't this be optional behavior? Not everyone disassembles only C++ code.