From: Wei-min Pan <weimin.pan@oracle.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH PR gdb/20057] Internal error on trying to set {char[]}$pc="string"
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 21:10:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <82a6d5fc-7152-88aa-115b-c767fd3f3569@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tvjzae0u.fsf@tromey.com>
On 11/29/2018 11:18 AM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> ">" == Wei-min Pan <weimin.pan@oracle.com> writes:
>>> Problem is copy_type will assert on to-be-copied type which does not
>>> have an
>>> associated objfile. It doesn't matter if the type is entirely arch-owned.
> I didn't follow this thread in too much detail, but FWIW I believe the
> rule is that an objfile-owned type can refer to a gdbarch-owned type --
> but not vice versa.
>
> Following that it seems to me that there should not be a need to call
> copy_type on a gdbarch-owned type. So maybe that can be avoided,
> instead of removing the assert?
>
> Tom
Looks like we have at least 2 options:
(1) Making sure the type is objfile-owned before calling copy_type in
resolve_dynamic_range and resolve_dynamic_array as you suggested, or
(2) Replacing the assert with an objfile-owned check in copy_type, similar
to what copy_type_recursive does.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-29 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-25 2:12 Weimin Pan
2018-01-25 4:14 ` Joel Brobecker
2018-01-25 22:24 ` Wei-min Pan
2018-01-31 7:45 ` Joel Brobecker
2018-02-01 1:46 ` Wei-min Pan
2018-02-01 8:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2018-02-02 1:14 ` Wei-min Pan
2018-11-14 23:38 ` Wei-min Pan
2018-11-14 23:51 ` Joel Brobecker
2018-11-15 0:16 ` Wei-min Pan
2018-11-29 19:18 ` Tom Tromey
2018-11-29 21:10 ` Wei-min Pan [this message]
2018-11-29 21:52 ` Tom Tromey
2018-11-29 23:26 ` Wei-min Pan
2018-11-30 15:37 ` Tom Tromey
2018-11-30 17:31 ` Wei-min Pan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=82a6d5fc-7152-88aa-115b-c767fd3f3569@oracle.com \
--to=weimin.pan@oracle.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox