From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 37808 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2016 15:47:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 37787 invoked by uid 89); 23 Sep 2016 15:47:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 15:46:59 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B030C05ACB0; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 15:46:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u8NFku69026918; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 11:46:57 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFA 0/5] Some random C++-ification To: Tom Tromey References: <1474566656-15389-1-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com> <1ee37f8c-0c1a-7368-4cea-96bbbf43a2af@redhat.com> <877fa21v0j.fsf@tromey.com> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <829eb611-adf8-77c4-db5e-f6d5040e4baf@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 15:49:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <877fa21v0j.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg00307.txt.bz2 On 09/23/2016 04:43 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: > > Tom> This should probably not go in until after Pedro's "new" patch. > > Pedro> Does that patch look OK to you? > > I read it just now and I think it looks fine. Great, thanks! I've pushed it in now (with a couple typos fixed in the commit log). Thanks, Pedro Alves