From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AFEE395383D for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:46:04 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 1AFEE395383D Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 04DDjs9t012791 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 13 May 2020 09:45:59 -0400 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 04DDjs9t012791 Received: from [10.0.0.193] (unknown [192.222.164.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42B181E5F9; Wed, 13 May 2020 09:45:54 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [committed][gdb/testsuite] Fix incorrect string concat in jit-elf.exp To: Tom de Vries , "Strasuns, Mihails" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" References: <20200512130002.GA3290@delia> <73a5e27b-a709-8861-1f88-a07a0a2a71f9@polymtl.ca> <256a0db7-98c2-7769-7991-981f59106ee4@suse.de> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <82395a9a-1595-e16c-8977-5f929f9041cc@polymtl.ca> Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 09:45:53 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <256a0db7-98c2-7769-7991-981f59106ee4@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: tl Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Wed, 13 May 2020 13:45:54 +0000 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 13:46:05 -0000 On 2020-05-13 4:52 a.m., Tom de Vries wrote: > Hi, > > I don't know if such a generic list exists. I'd say what makes sense > depends on the patch. > > For symtab-related patches, use readnow, cc-with-gdb-index, > cc-with-debug-names. > > If the test contains nonstandard handling of inferiors, try some > gdbserver boards (I'm not sure which). > > If the test contains explicit file handling, try some of the remote > boards (I'm not sure which). > > Thanks, > - Tom FWIW, I just learned it's possible to pass a list of target boards to --target_board: --target_board='unix native-gdbserver native-extended-gdbserver' And it gives a combined result at the end. So I'll make myself an alias to test on all the commonly used boards, probably: - cc-with-debug-names.exp - cc-with-dwz.exp - cc-with-dwz-m.exp - cc-with-gdb-index.exp - debug-types.exp - dwarf4-gdb-index.exp - fission-dwp.exp - fission.exp - native-extended-gdbserver.exp - native-gdbserver.exp - native-stdio-gdbserver.exp - readnow.exp When working on a single test, it's usually not to long to run them all. Of course, it's not really practical to run the complete testsuite twice (before and after) for each board for every change we do... Simon