From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 56773 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2016 14:07:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 56763 invoked by uid 89); 5 Oct 2016 14:07:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 14:07:12 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99AEEAA0A1; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 14:07:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u95E7A71028001; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 10:07:10 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Skip float complex types if gdb_skip_float_test To: Yao Qi References: <1475591646-9783-1-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org> <86wphmaox5.fsf@gmail.com> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <802153e0-6dc3-33cf-3def-4dfeabb6e565@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 14:07:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <86wphmaox5.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00088.txt.bz2 On 10/05/2016 02:47 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > Pedro Alves writes: > >> Shouldn't this be checked within support_complex_tests itself? >> AFAIK, _Complex is always about floating point: >> >> http://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/arithmetic_types#Complex_floating_types >> http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/numeric/complex > > Right, how about this? > LGTM. Thanks, Pedro Alves