Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Machado <luis.machado@linaro.org>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] gdb: print unknown part of flag enum in hex
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 11:04:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <801f3b0d-d452-101f-7f12-b5d0299a0307@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200213203035.30157-4-simon.marchi@efficios.com>

On 2/13/20 5:30 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
> When we print the "unknown" part of a flag enum, it is printed in
> decimal.  I think it would be more useful if it was printed in hex, as
> it helps to determine which bits are set more than a decimal value.
> 

Would it be better to mention the offending bit position explicitly? The 
hex value could be displayed along with it as well.

I mean, in both decimal and hex you'd need to do some calculations to 
figure out the bit position anyway. Might as well make it easier for 
developers by displaying the information.

> gdb/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* valprint.c (generic_val_print_enum_1): Print unknown part of
> 	flag enum in hex.
> 
> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* gdb.base/printcmds.exp (test_print_enums): Expect hex values
> 	for "unknown".
> ---
>   gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/printcmds.exp | 4 ++--
>   gdb/valprint.c                       | 4 ++--
>   2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/printcmds.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/printcmds.exp
> index 6afb965af066..d6f5c75650bf 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/printcmds.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/printcmds.exp
> @@ -743,10 +743,10 @@ proc test_print_enums {} {
>       gdb_test "print (enum flag_enum) 0x0" [string_to_regexp " = FE_NONE"]
>   
>       # Print a flag enum with value 0, where no enumerator has value 0.
> -    gdb_test "print flag_enum_without_zero" [string_to_regexp " = (unknown: 0)"]
> +    gdb_test "print flag_enum_without_zero" [string_to_regexp " = (unknown: 0x0)"]
>   
>       # Print a flag enum with unknown bits set.
> -    gdb_test "print (enum flag_enum) 0xf1" [string_to_regexp " = (FE_ONE | unknown: 240)"]
> +    gdb_test "print (enum flag_enum) 0xf1" [string_to_regexp " = (FE_ONE | unknown: 0xf0)"]
>   
>       # Test printing an enum not considered a "flag enum" (because one of its
>       # enumerators has multiple bits set).
> diff --git a/gdb/valprint.c b/gdb/valprint.c
> index 77b9a4993d79..bd21be69e1bf 100644
> --- a/gdb/valprint.c
> +++ b/gdb/valprint.c
> @@ -659,8 +659,8 @@ generic_val_print_enum_1 (struct type *type, LONGEST val,
>   	{
>   	  if (!first)
>   	    fputs_filtered (" | ", stream);
> -	  fputs_filtered ("unknown: ", stream);
> -	  print_longest (stream, 'd', 0, val);
> +	  fputs_filtered ("unknown: 0x", stream);
> +	  print_longest (stream, 'x', 0, val);
>   	}
>   
>         fputs_filtered (")", stream);
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-17 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-13 20:30 [PATCH 1/5] gnulib: import count-one-bits module and use it Simon Marchi
2020-02-13 20:30 ` [PATCH 5/5] gdb: change print format of flag enums with value 0 Simon Marchi
2020-02-17 12:08   ` Luis Machado
2020-02-17 19:02     ` Simon Marchi
2020-02-18 20:45   ` Tom Tromey
2020-02-18 20:52     ` Simon Marchi
2020-02-13 20:30 ` [PATCH 3/5] gdb: allow duplicate enumerators in flag enums Simon Marchi
2020-02-17 11:01   ` Luis Machado
2020-02-18 20:38   ` Tom Tromey
2020-02-18 20:42     ` Tom Tromey
2020-02-18 20:48     ` Simon Marchi
2020-02-18 21:57       ` Tom Tromey
2020-02-18 22:25         ` Simon Marchi
2020-02-13 20:30 ` [PATCH 2/5] gdb: fix printing of flag enums with multi-bit enumerators Simon Marchi
2020-02-17 10:56   ` Luis Machado
2020-02-17 17:27     ` Simon Marchi
     [not found]       ` <e1fc219b-3abf-29f0-b159-c2970fabbb17@linaro.org>
2020-02-17 19:20         ` Simon Marchi
2020-02-18 20:42           ` Tom Tromey
2020-02-13 20:38 ` [PATCH 4/5] gdb: print unknown part of flag enum in hex Simon Marchi
2020-02-17 11:04   ` Luis Machado [this message]
2020-02-17 18:59     ` Simon Marchi
2020-02-18 20:43   ` Tom Tromey
2020-02-14 19:53 ` [PATCH 1/5] gnulib: import count-one-bits module and use it Simon Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=801f3b0d-d452-101f-7f12-b5d0299a0307@linaro.org \
    --to=luis.machado@linaro.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox