Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: msnyder@redhat.com
Cc: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] New command "info proc" for Linux
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:26:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8011-Wed16Jan2002192316+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C45B35B.653A@redhat.com> (message from Michael Snyder on Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:07:39 -0800)

> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:07:39 -0800
> From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Michael, please don't forget the documentation.  Thanks.
> 
> Not straightforward.  Couple of issues:
> 
> 1) The old implementation of the "info proc" command was 
> poorly documented -- many of the documented sub-commands
> were never implemented.  And the command was only available
> on "/proc" systems (real ones, not Linux).
> 
> 2) The stuff I've just added will ONLY work on Linux, 
> not on other ("real") /proc systems.

Does that mean the functionality of this command differs on these two
classes of systems?  If so, we could:

 (a) document the functionality on both classes, telling which parts
 work on what systems;

or

 (b) document the GNU/Linux functionality that you just added, and
 leave the docs of what the command does on ``real'' /proc systems as
 it is now.

The latter will probably be easier for you (no need to figure out code
written by someone else ;-), and it doesn't make the situation worse
than it is now.  So I won't object if you do only (b).  (If you do, it
is possible that the Linux-specific docs could go into a new
subsection of the "Native" node, where system-specific features are
described.

Does that address your concerns?


  reply	other threads:[~2002-01-16 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-01-10 12:14 Michael Snyder
2002-01-11 16:25 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-15 12:11   ` Michael Snyder
2002-01-15 22:07     ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-01-16  9:13       ` Michael Snyder
2002-01-16  9:26         ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2002-01-16  9:52           ` Michael Snyder
2002-01-16 11:19             ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8011-Wed16Jan2002192316+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il \
    --to=eliz@is.elta.co.il \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=msnyder@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox