From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16889 invoked by alias); 29 May 2003 14:16:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16870 invoked from network); 29 May 2003 14:16:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO odin.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 May 2003 14:16:37 -0000 Received: from zaretsky (cable-128-114.inter.net.il [213.8.128.114]) by odin.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.3-GR) with ESMTP id BFB35696; Thu, 29 May 2003 17:14:42 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 14:16:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: mludvig@suse.cz Message-Id: <8011-Thu29May2003171558+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: kettenis@chello.nl, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3ED60F2A.9060108@suse.cz> (message from Michal Ludvig on Thu, 29 May 2003 15:46:18 +0200) Subject: Re: [RFA/i386newframe] info cfi command Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3ED60F2A.9060108@suse.cz> X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00537.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 15:46:18 +0200 > From: Michal Ludvig > > this patch adds 'info cfi' command which is to be used for examining > debug info. For now it only prints the instructions in a hex-form, but= > I'll make a resolver to nice strings later. > > It doesn't change anything except that it adds a new command. Thanks. > Can I commit it? If the code is approved (I cannot approve it), please write a change for the manual that documents the new command. I'd like to avoid a situation where we have undocumented commands. TIA