From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28896 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2002 19:16:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28862 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2002 19:16:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO frigg.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.16) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Apr 2002 19:16:24 -0000 Received: from zaretsky ([80.230.2.40]) by frigg.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 2.9.3.2) with ESMTP id BIQ04833; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 22:16:04 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 12:16:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: ac131313@cygnus.com Message-Id: <8011-Sun21Apr2002221607+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> CC: davem@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3CC2FA04.50605@cygnus.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:42:28 -0400) Subject: Re: [rfc/rfa:doc] PC_IN_SIGTRAMP; Was: [RFA] Multi-arch IN_SIGTRAMP Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20020421.011153.14656372.davem@redhat.com> <3CC2FA04.50605@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00736.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:42:28 -0400 > From: Andrew Cagney > > [Eli, note the doco update] Thanks for the heads-up. > * gdbint.texinfo (Target Architecture Definition): Replace > IN_SIGTRAMP with PC_IN_SIGTRAMP. Approved, with a few minor comments: > +@item PC_IN_SIGTRAMP (@var{pc}, @var{name}) > +@findex PC_IN_SIGTRAMP > +Sigtramp is a routine that the kernel calls Here you introduce a new term. It is best to give it a @dfn markup, so that it stands out, and add an index entry for it, so that someone who bumps into this term elsewhere in the manual could find its definition. So: @item PC_IN_SIGTRAMP (@var{pc}, @var{name}) @findex PC_IN_SIGTRAMP @cindex sigtramp A @dfn{sigtramp} is a routine that the kernel calls... > +This function, given a program counter value and the (possibly NULL) "NULL" should be in @code, since it's a C symbol. Also, it's better to say "... given a program counter value in @var{pc}...", since this immediately explains what is @var{pc}. Thanks.