From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1776 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2002 17:10:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1769 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2002 17:10:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freya.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.14) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Jun 2002 17:10:33 -0000 Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40]) by freya.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.1.0.58-GA) with ESMTP id BMK56326; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 20:10:28 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 10:10:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: kettenis@chello.nl Message-Id: <8011-Sun09Jun2002200908+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, dj@delorie.com In-reply-to: <200206091651.g59GpjQ40007@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> (message from Mark Kettenis on Sun, 9 Jun 2002 18:51:45 +0200 (CEST)) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add two new OS ABI variants Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200206091513.g59FDSc70617@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <2593-Sun09Jun2002193921+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <200206091651.g59GpjQ40007@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00148.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 18:51:45 +0200 (CEST) > From: Mark Kettenis > > But does it make > sense to use GDB_OSABI_DJGPP when all function names still use go32 > somewhere in their name? Do you have any plans for renaming those? I don't mind renaming go32-nat.c into djgpp-nat.c, but renaming a file in CVS has nasty side effects, and I'm not sure we have a reason good enough to suffer those side effects. But a new constant, if we name it DJGPP from day one, has no such adverse consequences.