From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18435 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2002 09:34:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18428 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2002 09:34:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO heimdall.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Aug 2002 09:34:09 -0000 Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40]) by heimdall.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.1.0.58-GA) with ESMTP id BRT90455; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 12:34:15 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 02:44:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: kettenis@chello.nl Message-Id: <8011-Sat24Aug2002123631+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <200208240035.g7O0ZU65032156@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> (message from Mark Kettenis on Sat, 24 Aug 2002 02:35:30 +0200 (CEST)) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mention some problems with using GDB on FreeBSD Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200208240035.g7O0ZU65032156@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00794.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 02:35:30 +0200 (CEST) > From: Mark Kettenis > > This patch makes PROBLEMS mention two problems with using GDB on > FreeBSD. Would it be possible to give users some idea about the phenomena they will see as the result of these problems? As the text goes now, I don't think a user could decide whether some problem they see is due to this bug or not. Also, it might be a good idea to tell them how to work around the bug (I'm guessing "gcc -gdwarf-2" or some such?).