From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13757 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2002 20:18:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13745 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2002 20:18:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO balder.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.15) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Dec 2002 20:18:49 -0000 Received: from zaretsky (adsl-ayalon-pc-128-23.inter.net.il [213.8.128.23]) by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.1-GA) with ESMTP id CAC99670; Mon, 9 Dec 2002 22:18:43 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 12:37:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: klee@apple.com Message-Id: <8011-Mon09Dec2002221736+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> CC: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Klee Dienes on Mon, 9 Dec 2002 01:39:38 -0500) Subject: Re: [RFA] Add stabs entries for coalesced symbols. Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00290.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 01:39:38 -0500 > From: Klee Dienes > > Just to be clear on why I was asking, my concern wasn't that it was the > only instance of "coalesced symbols" in the document, it was that it > was the only instance of @cindex in the document Hmm... that's true: stabs.texinfo doesn't use @cindex. But OTOH it doesn't have the command to generate the concept index, so adding @cindex won't hurt. > But I suspect > after reading your response that your response would be "well, that > just means we probably need more @cindex entries to be added". Yes, that's true.