From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 359 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2004 18:02:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 352 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2004 18:02:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2004 18:02:27 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-209-174.inter.net.il [80.230.209.174]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.5-GR) with ESMTP id CQJ07643; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 20:02:24 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:02:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Andrew Cagney Message-Id: <8011-Fri26Mar2004195947+0300-eliz@gnu.org> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <40646456.8030601@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:11:50 -0500) Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] PROBLEMS: Stack backtraces Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <40646456.8030601@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00673.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:11:50 -0500 > From: Andrew Cagney > > The attached updates the PROBLEMS: Stack backtraces section so that it > is more current. > > comments, it's intended for 6.1 I think these additions are very useful, so I think they should be in v6.1. A couple of minor gotchas: > +GDB's code base is being been updated to use a new backtrace > +mechanism. This mechanism makes possible the support of new features I think "This mechanism makes possible to support new features" is better. > +such DWARF 2 Call Frame Information (which in turn makes possible ^^^ "such as DWARF 2 Call Frame Information", I think; ``as'' is missing.