From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24791 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2002 16:23:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24776 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2002 16:23:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO balder.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.15) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Apr 2002 16:23:05 -0000 Received: from zaretsky (diup-223-102.inter.net.il [213.8.223.102]) by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 2.9.3.2) with ESMTP id BHI62819; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 19:22:56 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 08:23:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: brobecker@ACT-Europe.FR Message-Id: <8011-Fri05Apr2002191832+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20020405164329.A32599@act-europe.fr> (message from Joel Brobecker on Fri, 5 Apr 2002 16:43:29 +0200) Subject: Re: [RFA] xfullpath and new regression test xfullpath.exp - take 2 Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20020405164329.A32599@act-europe.fr> X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00163.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 16:43:29 +0200 > From: Joel Brobecker > > based on Eli's comments, I reworked the patch I posted in the > following message: > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-04/msg00000.html > > I reran the regression test on x86-linux and observed no new regression. > I am not reattaching the xfullpath.exp testcase, since Andrew already > approved it, but it can be retrieved at the URL above. I also took note > that this test will be located in the new gdb.gdb directory. > > The patch is attached. I used the isalpha function, which is part of > ANSI C. I hope this is fine? Yes, ANSI C is fine. The patch is approved. Please commit this.