From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id JwRnMVG+imn55DIAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 00:12:49 -0500 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=oN7TI54C; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id B7BA11E0BA; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 00:12:49 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (vm01.sourceware.org [38.145.34.32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8D3F1E089 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 00:12:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06EAF4BB589B for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 05:12:48 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 06EAF4BB589B Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=oN7TI54C Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E7AB4BB3BFD for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 05:12:20 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 2E7AB4BB3BFD Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 2E7AB4BB3BFD Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=148.163.158.5 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1770700340; cv=none; b=WnoNum5UJjPK8msmjVZzMN1HPgf7EuDrvZTm9euul/Uo98XQ3nSCLPA8pYIYErxuCPTtG1oiSsuMFuHnQzYayouwX8H/pSxRRYETywzYKTlTBMony8q6tAQXSRUVigJtlDn0BwUyX1E5iMJMOo7aR9nZdcI2d+PvpeEVJIgcF8I= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1770700340; c=relaxed/simple; bh=p4ZVtqVknbmupOPMDZk/lhIJ0Woh2LrH8u6Dl87MG5A=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=YE0k2gwqMqofWzu7fo2OPCT/PZAF2J3/Ldzm0Q+T/RWis4fnUMLYaKrETRE6uwyPE3yNNxyS3eGf1kT/hrKVqW5M1NA2IFKyWgGfbI6nPpIXJSwYgSaRJm3UGuqkfHsEuchVzJpCvJP7IKNLgw6zubR9ZRNbPLwKF4giuCAaP1I= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2E7AB4BB3BFD Received: from pps.filterd (m0360072.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.11/8.18.1.11) with ESMTP id 619EnheD188751; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 05:12:17 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=PUUgNEZ96k/Bqxnnt3DD4oK5oEcI9d QXmRROkHmjji8=; b=oN7TI54CeavwNQ5Ys7vop8rBNj1ORXZYMBfzESVfa+r7pp 8jOZGaoa9/jgWWrCwBv8qwiWZCg1Dbsxlx/Os8k8PxRKyFaMXnyIhrJw7r1RoLy3 gDcNmbxQ1zv8cqklUH0VzgRh/qJXagIZDHA/xBJEMZoCbClu1YFEPtY64SRF8YH5 wsgGJWfzx7M7QZVOBCIfET9meaJxbk/cqjCx5L3WYD5xxIagNs5dPuxQomBooHLB lFnGQRcByN3iN4oBCVrmuyz44ru5PtzUzSHCpvafxm522AR3NFFV6deRWltwyY83 trUsydxO/bwolptThMQZ9zMSc4IGn9ly5D6KVRGQ== Received: from ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5b.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.91]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4c696wrs0q-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 10 Feb 2026 05:12:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 61A4wWRF001499; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 05:12:17 GMT Received: from smtprelay07.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com ([172.16.1.74]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4c6gqn00bq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 10 Feb 2026 05:12:17 +0000 Received: from smtpav01.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav01.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [10.241.53.100]) by smtprelay07.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 61A5CD9n17957532 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 10 Feb 2026 05:12:14 GMT Received: from smtpav01.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0BA58057; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 05:12:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav01.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C9058058; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 05:12:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.109.244.244] (unknown [9.109.244.244]) by smtpav01.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Feb 2026 05:12:11 +0000 (GMT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------b2qREw3XuvCFzaJa06r4DAN7" Message-ID: <7fd2cc58-33ab-420a-83ba-e98cae69b028@linux.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 10:42:10 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: PPC64LE: New failures in empty-inline-cxx.exp after commit 196349e7e5939c2 References: <20260205093747.-PO3F%cel@linux.ibm.com> Content-Language: en-GB To: aburgess@redhat.com From: Abhay Kandpal Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com, cel@linux.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <20260205093747.-PO3F%cel@linux.ibm.com> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20260205093747.-PO3F%cel@linux.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=WZYBqkhX c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=698abe31 cx=c_pps a=GFwsV6G8L6GxiO2Y/PsHdQ==:117 a=GFwsV6G8L6GxiO2Y/PsHdQ==:17 a=HzLeVaNsDn8A:10 a=VkNPw1HP01LnGYTKEx00:22 a=Mpw57Om8IfrbqaoTuvik:22 a=GgsMoib0sEa3-_RKJdDe:22 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=20KFwNOVAAAA:8 a=QtvCK0KoQBOVcvcfyIcA:9 a=lqcHg5cX4UMA:10 a=3ZKOabzyN94A:10 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=yDv-aWB9hHzBaJyZhigA:9 a=OYpiQ2H6Q3rwzz4-:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 X-Proofpoint-GUID: CURd8Zr513HGtPHA9lpdJknBd73fv9Iy X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: CURd8Zr513HGtPHA9lpdJknBd73fv9Iy X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjYwMjEwMDAzNyBTYWx0ZWRfXwKcepx76Tm9v HyIVweBuiEcy1rBIya7+yBLi0B5UlBf1GDE7nef/rHufNw50Gela1zGgoohhPPV6YKwARaSueUU F0+oVY9cqp2MoffciTkd53Elj2TJAOVPxyunkEyuYRAeXYTqoyCH0uOnFb9IIY8B5yQZvxJSLr3 gpqDuBEHPo/Plu1NMQ2spAQz79JbIJsj7BOku2SfFR8MDV5tC/BP9BLFV9J+tR/og3yo1UzIhLn 9OTbKYbTbN9hcpVhmORIHuSqaqlMgXJGxf3zE+lqSDu5zyqA64t2IQVaP8iPmCHqmareZrVo67k lLyGSxpgxxxByU9CaUKpnioOAG5a4hFNDBJVma1Qu+z6uDG1bwFTUv2iPaP8qYY8HmX8c2/w5i4 ChF43OzDJMCRZG+RQZVcNvYDxc8kb801AZqUSNjG+QIaJFchCnBEu+gykU15NVl2mDj88iNtPHv XM9dVJq8MFjFgfjS6cg== X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1121,Hydra:6.1.51,FMLib:17.12.100.49 definitions=2026-02-09_01,2026-02-09_04,2025-10-01_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=typeunknown authscore=0 authtc= authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.22.0-2601150000 definitions=main-2602100037 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------b2qREw3XuvCFzaJa06r4DAN7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Andrew, We are seeing new test failures on our ppc64le systems after the upstream commit: commit 196349e7e5939c2bef11fd93f098401d5b7111a5 (HEAD) Author: Andrew Burgess > Date:   Fri Sep 20 13:56:27 2024 +0100 gdb: handle empty ranges for inline subroutines It appears that|gdb.opt/empty-inline-cxx.exp| was introduced as part of this change, and this test is now failing consistently on ppc64le across all optimization levels. A sample failure is shown below: gdb) run ^M Starting program: /home/abhay/GDB/latest_gdb/build-gdb/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.opt/empty-inline-cxx/empty-inline-cxx-Og ^M [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]^M Using host libthread_db library "/usr/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".^M ^M Breakpoint 1, 0x0000000010000794 in main () at /home/abhay/GDB/latest_gdb/build-gdb/gdb/testsuite/../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/empty-inline-cxx.cc:63^M 63 {^M (gdb) bt^M #0 0x0000000010000794 in main () at /home/abhay/GDB/latest_gdb/build-gdb/gdb/testsuite/../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/empty-inline-cxx.cc:63^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.opt/empty-inline-cxx.exp: opt_level=Og: backtrace in main break get_myclass^M Summary of new failures: +FAIL: gdb.opt/empty-inline-cxx.exp: opt_level=O0: backtrace in main +FAIL: gdb.opt/empty-inline-cxx.exp: opt_level=O1: backtrace in main +FAIL: gdb.opt/empty-inline-cxx.exp: opt_level=O2: backtrace in main +FAIL: gdb.opt/empty-inline-cxx.exp: opt_level=Og: backtrace in main Environment details: OS: Fedora 43 (ppc64le) Kernel: 6.17.6-300.fc43.ppc64le GDB commit: 9b876c724da83d8ac8200afa3c87d873fc49ef16 Build/Install: OK New failures: 4 (all in empty-inline-cxx.exp) The test does not exist prior to this change. This looks like a testsuite issue triggered by the new inline range handling on ppc64le. Could you please take a look, or let me know if I need to update the test expectations for this target? BR Abhay Kandpal --------------b2qREw3XuvCFzaJa06r4DAN7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 


Hi Andrew,


We are seeing new test failures on our ppc64le systems after the upstream commit:
commit 196349e7e5939c2bef11fd93f098401d5b7111a5 (HEAD)
Author: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Sep 20 13:56:27 2024 +0100
gdb: handle empty ranges for inline subroutines
 
It appears that gdb.opt/empty-inline-cxx.exp was introduced as part of this change, 
and this test is now failing consistently on ppc64le across all optimization levels. A sample failure is shown below:
gdb) run ^M 
Starting program: /home/abhay/GDB/latest_gdb/build-gdb/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.opt/empty-inline-cxx/empty-inline-cxx-Og ^M 
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]^M 
Using host libthread_db library "/usr/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".^M
^M 
Breakpoint 1, 0x0000000010000794 in main () at /home/abhay/GDB/latest_gdb/build-gdb/gdb/testsuite/../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/empty-inline-cxx.cc:63^M 
63      {^M 
(gdb) bt^M 
#0  0x0000000010000794 in main () at /home/abhay/GDB/latest_gdb/build-gdb/gdb/testsuite/../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.opt/empty-inline-cxx.cc:63^M 
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.opt/empty-inline-cxx.exp: opt_level=Og: backtrace in main 
break get_myclass^M
 

    
Summary of new failures:

    

      
        

          
            
+FAIL: gdb.opt/empty-inline-cxx.exp: opt_level=O0: backtrace in main
+FAIL: gdb.opt/empty-inline-cxx.exp: opt_level=O1: backtrace in main
+FAIL: gdb.opt/empty-inline-cxx.exp: opt_level=O2: backtrace in main
+FAIL: gdb.opt/empty-inline-cxx.exp: opt_level=Og: backtrace in main

          		
        

      
    

    

    
Environment details:

    

      
        

          
            
OS: Fedora 43 (ppc64le)
Kernel: 6.17.6-300.fc43.ppc64le
GDB commit: 9b876c724da83d8ac8200afa3c87d873fc49ef16
Build/Install: OK
New failures: 4 (all in empty-inline-cxx.exp)

          		
        

      
    

    

    
The test does not exist prior to this change.

    
This looks like a testsuite issue triggered by the new inline range handling on ppc64le.
Could you please take a look, or let me know if I need to update the test expectations for this target?

    

    
BR
Abhay Kandpal

    


    

  


--------------b2qREw3XuvCFzaJa06r4DAN7--