From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id OAxPOu35m189JgAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 07:33:01 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id EC07C1EFC1; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 07:33:01 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 869781E58D for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 07:33:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26AE93857033; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 11:33:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-wm1-f67.google.com (mail-wm1-f67.google.com [209.85.128.67]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2DA03857033 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 11:32:58 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org E2DA03857033 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=palves.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alves.ped@gmail.com Received: by mail-wm1-f67.google.com with SMTP id p22so2532054wmg.3 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 04:32:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mu8s2HiQlVS6btI7lwlYtCQrGqHW35dhuQkFeCERMx4=; b=O8gp9yEoONdpqfve5dyaf6Ec8XV/wCiCzYhPIwY7RBA9QS9DjuNyri14FGl8chflfR DsK+thgul7VJbecB77Ucg2Ah5zA0Y8iigfQdUlMhdVe7ZDnRxfLIVcKbtEMGe+oRLK7R +LcqA9UscV4B4a0B/iqAPXVIQZvKK8X678THY+1U28TzmXlx/HZcAq7iF2mS674KR83y RGSh9ZVRacQMFEHAxcryyrWyt0myZdy8pQVZx68YxeQVHdsIY3u0aksrArm6eC7JPbQN ABWQUOy+ln7JFbm3GNYABIJGuwwcE1+Fo7gm9fJf93+9dKWfwvx/tAaGmBHZwvBCn6+E Lypw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5328ln4T6gU6LrAEnO4wymFAa7dxKfoQsAvkNdEMUzLZvefL4rAe i7gYvn2jflc6ZYjpChazKHQmwFykaKF6/A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx6tj/QdmtN1qTL4odkgoAgbFoy1X+Ti80QuiBD2MUbX+tmL5mXXS2q4/BKw1WLZxfPiPeA+w== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:c30a:: with SMTP id t10mr2058775wmf.183.1604057577064; Fri, 30 Oct 2020 04:32:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8a0:f925:3b00:520e:b099:84db:573f? ([2001:8a0:f925:3b00:520e:b099:84db:573f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a3sm4380182wmb.46.2020.10.30.04.32.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 30 Oct 2020 04:32:55 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Make scoped_restore_current_thread's cdtors exception free (RFC) To: "Aktemur, Tankut Baris" , Simon Marchi , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" References: <20200708233125.1030-1-pedro@palves.net> <20200708233125.1030-4-pedro@palves.net> <58a4020f-fbbb-611f-eb23-c1b3fa25d4f2@simark.ca> <39ad8351-3f99-1162-4d2f-b5dbee5756f8@simark.ca> <47b34393-3833-bb85-84dc-9a8bde3e1a77@palves.net> <3293dbc2-922a-8589-dbc7-75ebd5a26175@simark.ca> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <7e4c3794-99fa-72fb-21be-26e0787495fc@palves.net> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 11:32:54 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" Hi! On 10/30/20 7:44 AM, Aktemur, Tankut Baris wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > This patch created the regression below: > > Breakpoint 1, 0x00000000004012bb in eh2 (/gdb-up/gdb/frame.c:641: internal-error: frame_id get_frame_id(frame_info*): Assertion `stashed' failed. > A problem internal to GDB has been detected, > further debugging may prove unreliable. > Quit this debugging session? (y or n) FAIL: gdb.base/eh_return.exp: hit breakpoint (GDB internal error) Hmm, sorry about that. It passes for me on the machine I was running tests on, so I missed it. I can reproduce it on a F27 machine. I'll take a better look.