From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1008 invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2009 23:40:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 978 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Aug 2009 23:40:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (HELO qw-out-1920.google.com) (74.125.92.148) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 23:39:55 +0000 Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so1226989qwf.24 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:39:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.119.69 with SMTP id y5mr1305042qcq.100.1251675593087; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:39:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <7d77a27d0908300813p78945f1cv8597e9ee675e959@mail.gmail.com> From: Jiang Jilin Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 23:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: <7d77a27d0908301639w3b6e0137l438b0fda32dd0264@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix cygwin build error with i386-linux-tdep.c To: Hui Zhu Cc: gdb-patches ml , Michael Snyder Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00569.txt.bz2 On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Hui Zhu wrote: > On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 23:13, Jiang Jilin wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Hui Zhu wrote: >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> =A0 if (tmpu32 > 499) >>> =A0 =A0 { >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 printf_unfiltered (_("Process record and replay target does= n't " >>> - =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 "support syscall = number %u\n"), tmpu32); >>> + =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 "support syscall = number %u\n"), (unsigned) tmpu32); >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 return -1; >>> =A0 =A0 } >>> >> >> Sorry, it's not clear to me. >> >> when looking into the code, I found the type of tmpu32 is uint32_t, >> why did the gcc complain "warning: unsigned int format, uint32_t arg >> (arg 2)"? >> >> %u doesn't mean unsigned int? >> > > Really? =A0what does it mean? I mean without your patch, the type of tmpu32 _is_ uint32_t, why did gcc complain? and when you cast it to unsigned, the warning disappeared? --=20 Thanks Jiang