From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11918 invoked by alias); 17 Sep 2019 12:36:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 11738 invoked by uid 89); 17 Sep 2019 12:36:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=rendered, HX-Languages-Length:736 X-HELO: simark.ca Received: from simark.ca (HELO simark.ca) (158.69.221.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:36:54 +0000 Received: from [172.16.0.120] (192-222-181-218.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.181.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 816071E093; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 08:36:52 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb docs: do not format the ++ in C++ in man page To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: carl@bordum.dk, gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <83o8zjwjdf.fsf@gnu.org> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <7d725d34-8367-c875-2528-662605295645@simark.ca> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 12:36:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <83o8zjwjdf.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2019-09/txt/msg00312.txt.bz2 On 2019-09-17 2:02 a.m., Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Like I said on IRC, I think the best way to fix this would be to fix the texi2pod.pl >> script to handle @t instead. > > I agree, but I'm also confused about the problem. If I go to that > page, I don't see @t there, and looking at the page source reveals > that C@t{++} has been correctly converted to C++. So I'm not > sure why Carl sees something different. > > What am I missing here? > Hi Eli, We are talking about the actual man page, as viewed with "man". The HTML (or info) version is rendered fine. I can view it by doing: 1. `cd gdb/doc` in the build directory 2. `make man` 3. `man -l gdb.1` Simon