From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: ac131313@cygnus.com
Cc: drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: gdbserver/{<foo>,<os>,<bar>}.c?; Was: [rfa] gdbserver overhaul
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 12:36:00 -0000
Message-id: <7999-Thu18Oct2001202904+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1011018101039.26141H-100000@is> <3BCEFBF4.3000508@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-10/msg00258.html

> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 11:57:40 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
> > 
> >> or if it did it couldn't use any of these low-* files right?
> > 
> > 
> > Sorry, I don't understand this.  How is the DJGPP port different from
> > any other port in this respect?
> 
> I don't think DJGPP's low/nat interface looks like UNIX's ptrace() or 
> /procfs so much of the existing low-* code wouldn't be used.

That's true, but the low-* files are supposed to be compiled on the
target system, not on the host, right?  If so, all but one of these
low-* files is irrelevant for other platforms as well, right?