Re: [PATCH 23/31] Don't resume new threads if scheduler-locking is in effect

Pedro Alves
2023-11-13T14:12:47Z

On 2023-06-08 19:24, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net> writes:
>
>> If scheduler-locking is in effect, like e.g., with "set
>
> I think 'like' in 'like e.g.' is redundant.

Removed it.

> But is there any other way
> to enable scheduler-locking mode? So wouldn't i.e. be a better choice?

I think you missed the "on" which wrapped to the next line. The text is:

... with "set scheduler-locking on", ...

so another example would be "set scheduler-locking step".

>
> But really, this all LGTM.
>
> Reviewed-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
>

Thanks!