From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 96484 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2017 13:20:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 96475 invoked by uid 89); 29 Nov 2017 13:20:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KB_WAM_FROM_NAME_SINGLEWORD,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=lunch X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:20:17 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 940938553E; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:20:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9BE560BE5; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:20:15 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: time to create the GDB 8.1.x branch? To: Ulrich Weigand , Joel Brobecker References: <20171128194442.8103FD80317@oc3748833570.ibm.com> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <783661b7-869e-cc95-6767-ff89e2634359@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:20:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-11/txt/msg00768.txt.bz2 On 11/28/2017 08:32 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 11/28/2017 07:44 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: >> Joel Brobecker wrote: >>>> I'd like to get in the last two patches to actually enable MPFR >>>> support for target floating-point emulation. >>>> >>>> Given that all outstanding comments have now been addressed, I think >>>> I should be able to just commit those this week (unless there are >>>> any objections), so this would still be fine with your proposed >>>> schedule. >>> >>> IIUC, you've now pushed those patches, right? >>> Ref: https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-11/msg00489.html >> >> Yes, those are all in now. >> >> As an unrelated matter, I just noticed this major regresion on powerpc64: >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2017-11/msg00666.html >> >> This is IMO another issue that really ought to be fixed before the >> release ... >> > > I agree. Your suggestion sounded good to me. I just haven't > yet had time to try it out. I wouldn't be offended if someone > beat me to it... :-) I tried it now and it seems to work fine, and the test I had added works on ppc too with that fix. I'll some more testing and post it after lunch. Thanks, Pedro Alves