From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 108853 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2016 11:35:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 108837 invoked by uid 89); 21 Jul 2016 11:35:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:3448 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:35:49 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5219EC0467ED; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:35:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u6LBZkaF028030; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 07:35:46 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFA 0/6] Add -Wunused-but-set-parameter and -Wunused-but-set-variable To: Yao Qi References: <1465248812-23902-1-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com> <6a954e1a-ed72-fc02-b9b6-cce85e9b58e9@redhat.com> Cc: Tom Tromey , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <7797fc3a-9651-3448-2def-3bc5b0c5cf55@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:35:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-07/txt/msg00244.txt.bz2 On 07/21/2016 12:10 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> >> I'd think it'd be acceptable to just build on a couple of the >> more common hosts, in the name of forward progress. >> > > Yes, I agree. > I had a mingw-w64 build tree already handy, so I gave it a try. It needs a couple patches. I'll send them as reply to this email. Thanks, Pedro Alves