From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20892 invoked by alias); 8 Aug 2004 03:57:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20885 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2004 03:57:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2004 03:57:17 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.155.37]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id ECG08949; Sun, 8 Aug 2004 06:57:11 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 03:57:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Michael Chastain Message-Id: <7704-Sun08Aug2004065437+0300-eliz@gnu.org> CC: cagney@gnu.org, kettenis@chello.nl, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <41155A83.nail9VC11PTRT@mindspring.com> (message from Michael Chastain on Sat, 07 Aug 2004 18:41:07 -0400) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve i386 prologue analyzer Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200408012158.i71LwpRw033840@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <3405-Mon02Aug2004070159+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <410EAFBB.5080102@gnu.org> <2914-Tue03Aug2004065313+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <200408061933.i76JX3HJ008032@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <4113EA3B.3000900@gnu.org> <2914-Sat07Aug2004183455+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <41150161.3000306@gnu.org> <41155A83.nail9VC11PTRT@mindspring.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00229.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 18:41:07 -0400 > From: Michael Chastain > > I'm gonna side with Andrew on this one. Just looking superficially at > the code, it's the kind of code that benefits from marinating in HEAD > for a while, getting exposed to different use conditions. Are you talking about the prologue analyzer change? If so, could you please explain why you think it needs any more ``marinating'' in HEAD?