From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30735 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2002 14:06:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30652 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2002 14:06:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO frigg.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.16) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Jan 2002 14:06:48 -0000 Received: from zaretsky ([192.116.55.139]) by frigg.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id BDV81209; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:06:33 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 06:06:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr Message-Id: <7704-Fri11Jan2002160358+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: emacs 21.1.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: kettenis@science.uva.nl, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <4.2.0.58.20020111143044.019c7e50@ics.u-strasbg.fr> (message from Pierre Muller on Fri, 11 Jan 2002 14:38:40 +0100) Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC 2] Remove hardware break and watchpoints at program exit. Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <4.2.0.58.20020111125745.0135ea48@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <4.2.0.58.20020111125745.0135ea48@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <4.2.0.58.20020111143044.019c7e50@ics.u-strasbg.fr> X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00288.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 14:38:40 +0100 > From: Pierre Muller > > The code does already generate a claim for i386 linux: > the linux code tries to write the dr registers using ptrace > but as the process is already finished, this fails. > See i386-linux-nt.c line 741. Why does the Linux port try to do that after the debuggee has died?