From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14630 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2012 08:59:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 14620 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Nov 2012 08:59:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from eu1sys200aog116.obsmtp.com (HELO eu1sys200aog116.obsmtp.com) (207.126.144.141) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 08:59:33 +0000 Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com ([164.129.1.35]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob116.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKUJzF7HQqP0XhxOXjel1IfOMxFtUal+uq@postini.com; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 08:59:32 UTC Received: from zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (zeta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.230.9]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 52D4C26F; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 08:58:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from Webmail-eu.st.com (safex1hubcas2.st.com [10.75.90.16]) by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 07C8C2A69; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 08:58:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SAFEX1MAIL1.st.com ([10.75.90.1]) by SAFEX1HUBCAS2.st.com ([10.75.90.16]) with mapi; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 09:58:50 +0100 From: Giuseppe MONTALTO To: Tom Tromey Cc: Pedro Alves , Eli Zaretskii , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , "Hafiz_Abid@mentor.com" Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 08:59:00 -0000 Subject: RE: [PATCH] enhancement of mi_cmd_data_write_memory_bytes for filling memory regions (was [PATCH] new MI command for pattern filling of memory regions) Message-ID: <76FE3225DF13124EA2D05B290B624C95E66C6DD0A1@SAFEX1MAIL1.st.com> References: <76FE3225DF13124EA2D05B290B624C95E65F2D466E@SAFEX1MAIL1.st.com> <87sjf9rzr0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <76FE3225DF13124EA2D05B290B624C95E65FECE356@SAFEX1MAIL1.st.com> <871umsqgu8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <76FE3225DF13124EA2D05B290B624C95E65FECE48F@SAFEX1MAIL1.st.com> <87397624b9.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <76FE3225DF13124EA2D05B290B624C95E662A6921F@SAFEX1MAIL1.st.com> <76FE3225DF13124EA2D05B290B624C95E6632A4256@SAFEX1MAIL1.st.com> <878vcc1s9f.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <76FE3225DF13124EA2D05B290B624C95E66B003EA8@SAFEX1MAIL1.st.com> <87wqzgwm4k.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <76FE3225DF13124EA2D05B290B624C95E66B004AC6@SAFEX1MAIL1.st.com> <50802300.6040304@redhat.com> <76FE3225DF13124EA2D05B290B624C95E66B370299@SAFEX1MAIL1.st.com> <76FE3225DF13124EA2D05B290B624C95E66C43ADB1@SAFEX1MAIL1.st.com> <50818617.1040306@redhat.com> <76FE3225DF13124EA2D05B290B624C95E66C43AE84@SAFEX1MAIL1.st.com> <87txszhlvw.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <87txszhlvw.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00240.txt.bz2 Thanks, I'm not going to submit other patches for the moment, so please check it in. Incidentally, I will submit a RFC on some Expect scripts I'm writing (for c= ++ validation), but it's a still work in progress, I think they're quite far f= rom being ready for integration. Sorry for the ^Ms, probably I edited the patch on Windows before actually sending it. Thanks, Giuseppe > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Tromey [mailto:tromey@redhat.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:37 PM > To: Giuseppe MONTALTO > Cc: Pedro Alves; Eli Zaretskii; gdb-patches@sourceware.org; > Hafiz_Abid@mentor.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH] enhancement of mi_cmd_data_write_memory_bytes > for filling memory regions (was [PATCH] new MI command for pattern filling > of memory regions) >=20 > >>>>> "Giuseppe" =3D=3D Giuseppe MONTALTO > writes: >=20 > Giuseppe> new patch attached. >=20 > This looks good. Please commit. >=20 > If you are going to write more patches, contact me off-list and I will ge= t you > set up with write-after-approval access. >=20 > Otherwise, let me know and I will check it in for you. >=20 > BTW, somehow your patch got ^Ms at the end of each line. >=20 > thanks, > Tom