From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81A193939C10 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 21:15:05 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 81A193939C10 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark@simark.ca Received: from [10.0.0.193] (unknown [192.222.164.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ECCED1E79B; Tue, 12 May 2020 17:15:04 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gdb: add type::code / type::set_code To: Tom Tromey Cc: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches , Simon Marchi References: <20200511234831.23065-1-simon.marchi@efficios.com> <87v9l0dh82.fsf@tromey.com> <554f216e-107c-af83-7e9f-19a3e449b27e@simark.ca> <87k11gdfvi.fsf@tromey.com> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <76210a42-aba1-dc50-1831-f81ce1d4fe2b@simark.ca> Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 17:15:04 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87k11gdfvi.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: tl Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 21:15:06 -0000 On 2020-05-12 5:04 p.m., Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Marchi writes: > > Simon> That crossed my mind too, but did not try it, to go one step at > Simon> the time. I'll try it eventually. > > Yeah, makes sense. > > BTW I did not see patch 2/2. > > Tom > I received a message telling me the message was too big and was being moderated, I hoped somebody would approve it and it would go through. I'll send it as a compressed attachment instead. Simon