From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8637 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2004 14:36:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8626 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2004 14:36:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2004 14:36:45 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.158.204]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.5-GR) with ESMTP id BMO75699; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 16:36:34 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:36:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Jason Molenda Message-Id: <7494-Fri19Mar2004163403+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <2124EB3A-7912-11D8-A2F0-000393D457E2@apple.com> (message from Jason Molenda on Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:26:17 -0800) Subject: Re: RFC patch mi-cmds.c table format (pedantic) Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <6994FFF8-786D-11D8-9229-000393D457E2@apple.com> <2124EB3A-7912-11D8-A2F0-000393D457E2@apple.com> X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00448.txt.bz2 > From: Jason Molenda > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:26:17 -0800 > > >> - { NULL, } > >> + { NULL, { NULL, 0 }, NULL, NULL} > > > > Don't these changes require changes to the GDB/MI documentation in > > gdb.texinfo? IIRC, there are examples there to what each command > > outputs. > > No, with each of these changes the same code is generated by the > compiler. What compiler? I thought we were talking about the output generated by the MI interpreter.