From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30830 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2020 15:14:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 30820 invoked by uid 89); 17 Jan 2020 15:14:29 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: simark.ca Received: from simark.ca (HELO simark.ca) (158.69.221.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 15:14:28 +0000 Received: from [172.16.0.95] (192-222-181-218.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.181.218]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 36D4C1E47D; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 10:14:25 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 18/24] Multi-target support To: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20191017225026.30496-1-palves@redhat.com> <20191017225026.30496-19-palves@redhat.com> Cc: "Morichetti, Laurent" From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <746ea4dc-3746-acd0-f61e-5bf892fd7388@simark.ca> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 15:18:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191017225026.30496-19-palves@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2020-01/txt/msg00532.txt.bz2 On 2019-10-17 6:50 p.m., Pedro Alves wrote: > This commit adds multi-target support to GDB. What this means is that > with this commit, GDB can now be connected to different targets at the > same time. E.g., you can debug a live native process and a core dump > at the same time, connect to multiple gdbservers, etc. I have reported another bug introduced by this patch, originally reported to me by Laurent, in CC. Essentially, starting an inferior, then trying to run a second inferior twice, gives us a: warning: td_ta_new failed: generic error and the second run does not successfully execute the program. I filed it in bugzilla: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25410 Simon