From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18150 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2003 04:22:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18138 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2003 04:22:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bilbo.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.18) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2003 04:22:20 -0000 Received: from zaretsky ([80.230.234.142]) by bilbo.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.2-GA) with ESMTP id AKA80695; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 06:22:11 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 04:22:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: ac131313@redhat.com Message-Id: <7458-Wed26Mar2003061550+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3E80CEE7.6090609@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:49:27 -0500) Subject: Re: [rfa:doco] inline gdbmi.texinfo and annotate.texinfo in gdb.texinfo Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3E80CEE7.6090609@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00511.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:49:27 -0500 > From: Andrew Cagney > > The attatched merges the gdbmi.texinfo and annotate.texinfo into > gdb.texinfo. > > Seeing as I was doing annotate, I figured I might as well do gdb/mi. It > only deletes gdbmi.texinfo, as I've plans for annotate.texinfo. > > It also does a s/@example/@smallexample/ on those inlined files. > > ok? I don't mind, but what's the reasons for merging gdbmi.texinfo?