From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3515 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2001 17:09:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3438 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2001 17:09:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO odin.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2001 17:09:46 -0000 Received: from zaretsky ([192.116.55.139]) by odin.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id ACX61398; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 19:09:32 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:09:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: klee@apple.com Message-Id: <7458-Tue11Dec2001190820+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: emacs 21.1.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: msnyder@cygnus.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Klee Dienes on Tue, 11 Dec 2001 11:34:17 -0500) Subject: Re: [RFC] add 'save-breakpoints' command Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00301.txt.bz2 > From: Klee Dienes > Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 11:34:17 -0500 > > . I'm certainly willing to document the additional convenience > variables, but I'm not sure where a good section for them would be. It sounds like I've misread the code: I thought restoring the breakpoints also sets input-radix for the rest of the session. But I understand now that the saved commands undo that effect before the session continues, is that right? If so, there's no need to document anything about that, except, perhaps, saying that the breakpoints, when restored, will use the same input-radix as when they were defined. With that comment, the patch you posted is approved. Thanks.