From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 63783 invoked by alias); 13 Aug 2019 02:39:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 63774 invoked by uid 89); 13 Aug 2019 02:39:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:670 X-HELO: simark.ca Received: from simark.ca (HELO simark.ca) (158.69.221.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 02:39:44 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (unknown [192.222.164.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97B9C1F33E; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 22:39:42 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [patch, testsuite] Fixes for gdb.python tests on remote Windows host To: Sandra Loosemore , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" References: <59beb385-aec5-13b8-6095-3c7eb18f94be@codesourcery.com> <4f8bea28-6386-9558-37f0-900171482d67@codesourcery.com> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <731a43d7-8899-0270-c63a-60f8364c14f8@simark.ca> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 02:39:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4f8bea28-6386-9558-37f0-900171482d67@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2019-08/txt/msg00261.txt.bz2 On 2019-08-12 10:31 p.m., Sandra Loosemore wrote: > Yes. On Windows host, the output I'm seeing for this test that it's > trying to match is: > > (gdb) info auto-load python-scripts > Loaded Script > > > Yes py-section-script.py > > > full name: \\long\windows\path\to\py-section-script.py > Yes gdb.inlined-script > > > (gdb) > > This matches the first "fail" pattern as well as the "pass" pattern, so > the ordering is important. From the comment on this test, it's clear > this output is intended to be a "pass", so that one should go first. > > -Sandra Ok, that clears it up, thanks. Simon