From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16439 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2005 13:30:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16306 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2005 13:30:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO netlx010.civ.utwente.nl) (130.89.1.92) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2005 13:30:17 -0000 Received: from weblx058.utsp.utwente.nl (weblx058.utsp.utwente.nl [130.89.1.228]) by netlx010.civ.utwente.nl (8.11.7/HKD) with SMTP id j1GDU0w19507; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:30:00 +0100 From: "M.M. Kettenis" Subject: Re: [RFA] Use TRY_CATCH in wrapper.c MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <7319934860044785@weblx058.utsp.utwente.nl> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:43:00 -0000 To: Andrew Cagney , Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <42134451.8090700@gnu.org> Content-description: Message body Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: Quoted-Printable X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: m.m.kettenis@alumnus.utwente.nl X-SW-Source: 2005-02/txt/msg00165.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: > Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Andrew, > > > > Am I right in assuming that TRY_CATCH was added to make things like > > this possible? It sure cleans things up up ;-). > > Yes, exactly. These cleanups, assuming before/after test results are > identical, should be treated as obvious. Thanks. I was a bit confused since only the function in exceptions.c used the stuff. Committed now, Mark