From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 105801 invoked by alias); 13 Aug 2019 02:54:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 105792 invoked by uid 89); 13 Aug 2019 02:54:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:710 X-HELO: simark.ca Received: from simark.ca (HELO simark.ca) (158.69.221.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Aug 2019 02:54:44 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (unknown [192.222.164.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F9AB1F33E; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 22:54:42 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [patch, testsuite] Fixes for gdb.python tests on remote Windows host To: Sandra Loosemore , Christian Biesinger Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" References: <59beb385-aec5-13b8-6095-3c7eb18f94be@codesourcery.com> <876b1691-f90a-5944-3c7e-d756fc2114ce@codesourcery.com> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <7299592f-829a-b8e8-a257-c2a0d4eee9df@simark.ca> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 02:54:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <876b1691-f90a-5944-3c7e-d756fc2114ce@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2019-08/txt/msg00262.txt.bz2 On 2019-08-12 10:18 p.m., Sandra Loosemore wrote: > I believe they are completely separate targets. I don't know much about > cygwin, but I assume that Python built for cygwin library is linked with > the cygwin C library and understands cygwin's fake symbolic links, while > Python built for the mingw C library certainly does not. Similarly, > using ";" instead of ":" in PATH-like things is a Windows thing, while > I'm pretty sure cygwin emulates the POSIX syntax. Indeed, testing on cygwin would be a whole other task. I forgot to mention, the patch LGTM, so if Christian is fine with this response too, then please push. Simon