From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28851 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2003 19:59:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28843 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2003 19:59:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO frigg.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.16) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 4 Feb 2003 19:59:29 -0000 Received: from zaretsky (adsl-ayalon-pc-129-194.inter.net.il [213.8.129.194]) by frigg.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.2-GA) with ESMTP id CDH56573; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 21:58:49 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 19:59:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: kewarken@qnx.com Message-Id: <7263-Tue04Feb2003215610+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <006901c2cc55$07e5eab0$2a00a8c0@dash> (kewarken@qnx.com) Subject: Re: patch to add QNX NTO i386 support Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <004c01c2cc52$56dddb80$2a00a8c0@dash> <006901c2cc55$07e5eab0$2a00a8c0@dash> X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00132.txt.bz2 > From: "Kris Warkentin" > Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 08:55:08 -0500 > > Okay, here's the patch. Thanks. However, I don't understand why did you include some of the files in fnchange.lst: AFAICS they don't create any conflicts. For example: > + @V@/gdb/config/tm-qnxnto.h @V@/gdb/config/tm-qnx.h There's no other file in the gdb/config/ directory whose name will clash with tm-qnxnto.h after truncation to 8+3 limits.