From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18191 invoked by alias); 24 May 2003 08:02:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18165 invoked from network); 24 May 2003 08:02:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bilbo.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.18) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 May 2003 08:02:48 -0000 Received: from zaretsky (tony08-194-113.inter.net.il [80.230.194.113] (may be forged)) by bilbo.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.2-GA) with ESMTP id ARM51023; Sat, 24 May 2003 11:02:39 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 08:02:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: ac131313@redhat.com Message-Id: <7263-Sat24May2003110425+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3ECBE2D9.5060502@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Wed, 21 May 2003 16:34:33 -0400) Subject: Re: [rfa:doco] Doco problems with level two annotations Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3EC57FE4.1000704@redhat.com> <8011-Sat17May2003112039+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> <3ECBE2D9.5060502@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00474.txt.bz2 [Sorry for the long delay in replying to this message.] > Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 16:34:33 -0400 > From: Andrew Cagney > > Anyway, the real reason is that I happen to know that the GNU Press > person would like the GDB group to try to keep the basic user manual > trim. If that's the real reason, let's at least document it, either in a comment in the .texi file or in the ChangeLog, lest some helpful soul will want to make it an appendix in a distant future. We could arrange for this paper to become an appendix only in the on-line manual (using @itex), but if that is too much work (since I think the menus and possibly @node lines will need to be @iftex'ed as well as the text itself), I have no objections to doing it your way.