From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id kFhBNTwokl8oUAAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 20:47:56 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id CCC8E1E89B; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 20:47:56 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CB4D1E58E for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 20:47:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 995CE3857819; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 00:47:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D9633857818 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 00:47:53 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 5D9633857818 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark@simark.ca Received: from [10.0.0.11] (173-246-6-90.qc.cable.ebox.net [173.246.6.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0EE61E58E; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 20:47:52 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PING][PING] Added x86_64 stub for debugging embedded systems running on Intel x86_64 processor architecture. To: "Battig, Caleb" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" References: <84cb0009-cbd5-975a-cdaf-ac8cd77686aa@simark.ca> <074c171f-c4c0-d50f-0b51-c2d3e7e79ad3@simark.ca> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <718eea4d-16a5-ea53-e801-19b51212308d@simark.ca> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 20:47:52 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Lovett, Stuart" , "Peikes, Wendy" Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 2020-10-22 12:34 p.m., Battig, Caleb wrote: > Simon, > > Any updates on finding reviewers for this? I am going to be out of office all of next week and thus unable to answer further questions. > > Thanks, The problem isn't really reviewers (although I'd appreciate if anybody who knows the low-level x86-64 bits could take a second look). I sent an inquiriy to the FSF regarding the licensing, I got a response that they'll take a look soon. I'll let you know when I have an answer. These stubs are licensed "public domain", with no copyright claim, so it is a bit out of the ordinary for us. I prefer asking to make sure we do the right thing. In any case, you will likely have to file a copyright assignment with the FSF, where you accept to transfer the copyright on the contributed code to the FSF. It would be a good idea to get that started right now, since it can take a bit of time for them to process it. This is the form you need to complete and send them: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/plain/doc/Copyright/request-assign.future Simon Simon