From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id plymLEdB2WIBrRcAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 08:06:31 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id A965C1E5EA; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 08:06:31 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=r4ke/SDF; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D5A81E13B for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 08:06:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5FE03857B8D for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 12:06:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B5FE03857B8D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1658405190; bh=gZmINbldYKWjcmcZ7Bxcra3P0P6l7G5yY6ufQqYVfIY=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=r4ke/SDF0iGZO3q1UVlLY8EjfFG89G5aTzE2WMMcYrpkri/mKSc8izvRC82thb4vr BTipvslwEP9acV6/wpdo7h7KC5Hart5vIKNQbfyCccd+iqhygRth5ZiipM03ElNxOo NN9rkzWJw7Lv9VKdHY4VxTk7sS955hvyVq9ZAgBw= Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1d]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC1DF3858D28 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 12:06:10 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org BC1DF3858D28 Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 098DE1F7AB; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 12:06:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4FC113A1B; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 12:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id wl3HNjFB2WK+fgAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Thu, 21 Jul 2022 12:06:09 +0000 Message-ID: <716feba4-7ca1-dc46-12b3-e7a895956d8b@suse.de> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 14:06:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH][gdb] Fix python selftest with python 3.11 Content-Language: en-US To: Mark Wielaard References: <20220721111316.GA23728@delia.home> <20220721114239.GB7014@gnu.wildebeest.org> In-Reply-To: <20220721114239.GB7014@gnu.wildebeest.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Tom de Vries Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 7/21/22 13:42, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 01:13:17PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote: >> Fix this by also allowing line number 0. >> >> Tested on x86_64-linux. >> >> This should hopefully fix buildbot builder gdb-rawhide-x86_64. >> >> Any comments? > > It seems the line number is really irrelevant here for where exactly > the KeyboardInterrupt took place. So the patch looks good to me. > Thanks for the review. > Note that there is a gdb-try-rawhide-x86_64 builder, so you can also > test by pushing this to a git users/vries/try-xxx branch. I've tried that, and it went fine, so I've pushed this (after fixing a trivial formatting issue, not reposting). Thanks, - Tom