From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25246 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2003 16:58:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25224 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2003 16:58:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Dec 2003 16:58:25 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.158.217]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.8-GR) with ESMTP id CBF28457; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 18:58:12 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:58:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: "J. Johnston" Message-Id: <7137-Fri12Dec2003185654+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3FD8C695.6080400@redhat.com> (jjohnstn@redhat.com) Subject: Re: [RFA]: breakpoint.c patch (prelude to pending breakpoint support) Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3FD7C458.2080404@redhat.com> <3FD89C2E.9070906@redhat.com> <3FD8C695.6080400@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00332.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:33:41 -0500 > From: "J. Johnston" > > The comment about the line length for my ChangeLog entries comes > up continously and I thought it was time I just pointed out that I > am on the same page as everyone else with regards to this. In that case, it is IMHO unreasonable to ask the maintainers to remember such miniscule details about specific contributors. I suggest, like Daniel did, that you simply use the exact ChangeLog entry in your message. It is, after all, very easy to do: simply always make an entry when you produce the patch to send to the list, don't postpone that until the patch is approved. As a side-effect, you will not need to remember all the changes you did back then with their reasons.