From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23194 invoked by alias); 7 May 2004 08:22:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23162 invoked from network); 7 May 2004 08:22:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 May 2004 08:22:18 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.142.26]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id CVL25561; Fri, 7 May 2004 11:13:44 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 08:22:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Daniel Jacobowitz Message-Id: <7137-Fri07May2004111312+0300-eliz@gnu.org> CC: weigand@i1.informatik.uni-erlangen.de, orjan.friberg@axis.com, kettenis@chello.nl, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20040506213634.GA18832@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Thu, 6 May 2004 17:36:34 -0400) Subject: Re: Display of read/access watchpoints when HAVE_NONSTEPPABLE_WATCHPOINT Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200405062134.XAA05759@faui1d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <20040506213634.GA18832@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00185.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 17:36:34 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > This means that write watchpoints which use the same value as the > previous value wouldn't trigger, on platforms where we could support > that; which is kind of a shame. Exactly.