From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18650 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2004 17:58:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18643 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2004 17:58:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 Jul 2004 17:58:23 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.148.60]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id DXD27073; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:58:20 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 17:58:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Mark Kettenis Message-Id: <7105-Sat24Jul2004205643+0300-eliz@gnu.org> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <200407241259.i6OCxu8R041119@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> (message from Mark Kettenis on Sat, 24 Jul 2004 14:59:56 +0200 (CEST)) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Partial fix for PR backtrace/1718 Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200407241259.i6OCxu8R041119@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00350.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 14:59:56 +0200 (CEST) > From: Mark Kettenis > > This fixes the backtrace problem with Emacs that Eli reported. Alas, it doesn't fix the problem for me: after applying the patch to i386-tdep.c that shipped with GDB 6.1, I still get the same mess in the backtrace at the same place. Should the patch work for GDB 6.1? Let me know how can I help you further.